New DUI Law Took Effect Last Month: What Does it Mean for the Newly Arrested?

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017

The coordinator of the Washington County DUI Court, John Ridge, would like people to use the term “first conviction” instead of “first offense” when talking about the changes made recently to Pennsylvania’s driving while intoxicated law.

Typically, the first time a driver is picked up for a DUI that does not involve a crash, he or she might be offered ARD. Otherwise known as Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition, a person qualifies as long as he or she has submitted to a breath test or blood test and their blood alcohol level is on the lower end of the intoxication spectrum.

ARD does not result in a drunk driving conviction, but it is also only offered one time. Any DUI charge a person receives after going through ARD could end up being a first conviction.

Ridge states that the law is difficult to understand.

A summation offered by the American Automobile Association states that the first time a person is charged with a BAC that is over .10%, he or she is required to have an ignition interlock installed on their vehicle. Prior to this, the device was only required for second offenses and any that came after that.

With the change in the law, a first-time DUI offender is allowed to retain driving privileges immediately, instead of having to wait to drive until after they serve a driver’s license suspension. Under the old law, a first-time offender lost his or her driver’s license for anywhere from 30 days to a year, depending on how much alcohol was detected in their system.

Drivers who refuse to submit to a blood-alcohol test on a first offense will be allowed to install the device and drive after serving six months of a license suspension, no matter how long their suspension is. Under the previous law, the driver would have their license suspended for anywhere from one year to 18 months.

And in case a driver has someone else breathe into the interlock device and then the driver tries to drive drunk, the device tests randomly while the car is in motion with the driver behind the wheel. This is called a “rolling re-test.”

Ridge describes the device as “pretty nifty;” the offender is required to pay for the installation of the device.

Last year in Washington County, 299 people either pled guilty to DUI charges or were found guilty of them either by a jury or in a bench trial in front of a judge.

Ridge says that all of them were “subject to some form of ignition interlock.”

Along with the ignition interlock device, drivers now need an interlock license. Under the old law, they were allowed to hold an occupational limited license that let them drive to work, treatment, or school. However, drivers going through the ARD program must have all their fines and court costs paid before becoming eligible for it and the ignition interlock device.

Of those arrested for DUI in Pennsylvania, the average blood alcohol level is 0.17 percent, more than double the 0.08 percent legal limit.

If you are one of those arrested for DUI, call us at Logue Law. My associates and I will be glad to help. Contact us today at 844-PITT-DUI (748-8384) or (412)389-0805 AVAILABLE 24/7 You can also contact us online.

Source: http://www.observer-reporter.com/20170914/new_dui_law_took_effect_last_month_what_does_it_mean_for_the_newly_arrested

Client Reviews
“Mr. Logue came to me for my consultation, which was nice! He helped me better understand my situation so I could weigh my options. He kept me updated on any new information about my case, and I could always easily contact him if I had any questions. I knew I was in good hands, and I got the best possible outcome for my case!”
★★★★★
“Sean Logue accomplished an incredible thing for me by handling my legal matters. If you need help, this is the man to represent you...he's very keen, knowledgeable, and efficient in guiding you to freedom. The trust and loyalty he gives you is very down to earth, so if you need a lawyer this is the best one. You can feel totally confident in Sean's hands. Excellent job, thank you for taking the time for me, you took all my worries away...God bless your future.” Anonymous
★★★★★
“Mr Logue was the one I hired after talking to other attorneys about my case. He was the most knowledgeable and explained everything to me about his plan for me moving forward. He was always available to answer my questions and fought hard for me!! Don't waste your time looking for anyone else to help you. Mr Logue did an amazing job and very professional!” Anonymous
★★★★★
“Atty. Logue represented me well and took care of my legal issues superbly. He is a no-nonsense, very knowledgeable and well respected lawyer. I was pleased with his services. Would definitely recommend Atty. Logue to others.” Anonymous
★★★★★
“Mr. Logue is good for one reason, he cares. A client is not a quick buck. He always answers his phone, day or night and he understands the law better than anyone. He always answers my calls for both corporate and personal legal decisions and I have a ton of questions. His rates are reasonable too. Fair and firm.” Anonymous
★★★★★