Super Lawyers Rising Stars
Avvo Rating 10
Avvo Clients' Choise Award
National College for DUI Defense
Lead Counsel Rated
The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 under 40
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Proposed PA Law Would Require Ignition Interlock for 1st Time DUIs

FEBRUARY 11, 2015

As a Pittsburgh criminal defense attorney who handles a high volume of DUI defense cases, I will be the first to admit that I don’t agree with much of what Mothers Against Drunk Driving does.

For example, I absolutely do not believe that lowering the standard for DUIs – making .02 percent the legal limit as opposed to the current standard of .08 percent – will reduce the number of drunk drivers or drunk driving incidents.

With that said, I am supportive of an effort to change Pennsylvania law to make DUIs punishable by ignition interlock – an effort MADD also champions.

I am a Pittsburgh DUI Lawyer in both Pennsylvania and West Virginia (where you MUST have an ignition interlock device installed in order to participate in the state’s first-time offender program). Myriad Pennsylvania DUI clients have commented that they would far prefer to bear the cost and inconvenience of the ignition interlock if it meant they wouldn’t have to endure a license suspension (the way it is in West Virginia).

I’m a Pittsburgh DUI Lawyer for my clients first: And believe that a license suspension does nothing more in most cases than further their legal troubles. Some clients have lost their jobs when they lost their licenses because they could no longer commute to and from their offices. And without a job, it’s tough to pay the fines and court costs associated with a DUI.

I, of course, will acknowledge that DUI defendants aren’t victims – they chose to drink and then get behind the wheel. However, making the system more difficult and costly to navigate does nothing- including for the cause of DUI prevention.

But studies have proven that ignition interlock systems DO decrease drunk driving incidents.

In fact, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, ignition interlock systems are effective in reducing repeat drunk driving offenses by 67 percent.

Yes, 67 percent.

That’s why I’m interested in learning more about the proposal MADD is backing, a proposal from Sen. John Rafferty – SB 290 and HB 278 authored by Rep. Keith Greiner – which would require convicted drunk drivers with BACs of .10 percent or more use an ignition-interlock device for a period of at least six months.

It should also be noted that both bills follow the recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board and every major traffic safety organization, including AAA and the Governors Highway Safety Association.

What do you think?


In 2016, Governor Tom Wolf signed this legislation into law. It took effect on August 25, 2017, and requires first-time DUI offenders with a BAC of .10 percent or higher to have an ignition interlock installed in their vehicle for at least a year, or have their driver’s license suspended for a year. Most of these first-time offenders are eligible to drive with an ignition interlock immediately. Others will have to go through the license suspension before getting the device and accompanying Ignition Interlock License.

Certain conditions apply to the eligibility of an Ignition Interlock Limited License and device. Most applicants who are not first-time DUI offenders must wait until they have served six to nine months of a suspension, but a few can apply immediately. PennDOT has a form called the DL-9108 that must be filled out. This form contains another form within it called a 9108SC form. Both must be completed and sent via certified mail to PennDOT, along with the appropriate amount of fees.

Also, one of these devices and specialized licenses can be granted to someone who has refused a BAC test. Half the restoration fee must be paid before a person will be granted the Ignition Interlock Limited License.

At the end of your term, you must have a compliance form filed to get your unrestricted license back. The purpose of the form is to certify that you had no violations in the 30 to 60 days prior to the end of your ignition interlock term.

Source: New law will change how first-time DUI offenders are punished

Client Reviews
Mr. Logue came to me for my consultation, which was nice! He helped me better understand my situation so I could weigh my options. He kept me updated on any new information about my case, and I could always easily contact him if I had any questions. I knew I was in good hands, and I got the best possible outcome for my case! Anonymous
Sean Logue accomplished an incredible thing for me by handling my legal matters. If you need help, this is the man to represent you...he's very keen, knowledgeable, and efficient in guiding you to freedom. The trust and loyalty he gives you is very down to earth, so if you need a lawyer this is the best one. You can feel totally confident in Sean's hands. Excellent job, thank you for taking the time for me, you took all my worries away...God bless your future. Anonymous
Mr Logue was the one I hired after talking to other attorneys about my case. He was the most knowledgeable and explained everything to me about his plan for me moving forward. He was always available to answer my questions and fought hard for me!! Don't waste your time looking for anyone else to help you. Mr Logue did an amazing job and very professional! Anonymous
Atty. Logue represented me well and took care of my legal issues superbly. He is a no-nonsense, very knowledgeable and well respected lawyer. I was pleased with his services. Would definitely recommend Atty. Logue to others. Anonymous
Mr. Logue is good for one reason, he cares. A client is not a quick buck. He always answers his phone, day or night and he understands the law better than anyone. He always answers my calls for both corporate and personal legal decisions and I have a ton of questions. His rates are reasonable too. Fair and firm. Anonymous